From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Aug 12 22:41:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F035C9A0335 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@ignoranthack.me) Received: from mail.ignoranthack.me (ignoranthack.me [199.102.79.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D48B2D69 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@ignoranthack.me) Received: from [192.168.200.200] (unknown [50.136.155.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: sbruno@ignoranthack.me) by mail.ignoranthack.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71B501928D6 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Reply-To: sbruno@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible Error in the FreeBSD 10.2 Release Notes/Man page for TCP References: <131f8a0f25200031103639e969702727@dweimer.net> <20150812221546.GB1460@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Sean Bruno Message-ID: <55CBCB91.9010301@ignoranthack.me> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:41:21 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150812221546.GB1460@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:41:25 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 08/12/15 15:15, Glen Barber wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:09:31PM -0500, dweimer wrote: >> I was reading through the Release notes, and decided to enable >> net.inet.tcp.pmtud_blackhole_detection in my test environment. It >> appears that the monitoring tunable >> net.inet.tcp.pmtud_blackhole_min_activated is incorrectly listed. >> Using sysctl -a | grep net.inet.tcp.pmtud, doesn't show it as a >> result. The test system is running RC3 built on the 7th from >> revision 286391 of the https://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.2 >> tree. >> >> root@freebsd:/usr/src # sysctl -a | grep net.inet.tcp.pmtud >> net.inet.tcp.pmtud_blackhole_mss: 1200 >> net.inet.tcp.pmtud_blackhole_failed: 0 >> net.inet.tcp.pmtud_blackhole_activated_min_mss: 0 >> net.inet.tcp.pmtud_blackhole_activated: 0 >> net.inet.tcp.pmtud_blackhole_detection: 1 >> >> I did confirm that the pmtud_blackhole_min_activated option is >> also listed in the tcp(4) man page page as well. >> >> If anyone is more familiar with this than I am can they look into >> seeing if there is indeed an error, or if I am missing something >> here. >> > > This appears to be an error based on the content of the commit > log. I will confirm with the person that committed the code, and > will note the findings in the 10.2-RELEASE errata document. > > Glen > This looks like I failed to MFC r276345 to stable 10 in order to update tcp.4 leading to this confusion. sean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJVy8uPXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5kfV0H/jluKnznRLif5znvcy/4yNuE 1uP2pG3dyxJXK2GgCSb8gmyO3bM4Wn3C+BVYcPt3hC86koudyAB3edNUYKQ3qjzg H3cYWK/IY6mCzblBKm1WRRpleISjWtQgfjAXwJs1VlSgobtIIqmGqj2ksOiye1FB 1okLFqCMq/Gb2arHVD7jiRyVU8RqRLagCu9xNfKcn+xo79ietluAdpxZosW+wovJ RqNLLy55O7tW7c97KGCi/Rot6eb5tLotGJxjwnkMkxecizfGc26WIZVWZSF+9B4g ctYFiyZ1mL2sRmH+nhV7tbDyzoCA++yj3jLzbysnziXmicBeAchyjwvhJ2Xp1Oo= =Q+HE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----