From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 19:35:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC336106566B; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp6.server.rpi.edu (smtp6.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8BE8FC1A; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp6.server.rpi.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n13JZS8W005847; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:35:29 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20090203155354.GC33520@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20090130.085130.-4349483.imp@bsdimp.com> <20090130.093052.-2022808221.imp@bsdimp.com> <20090202220628.GA76833@dragon.NUXI.org> <20090202.154213.387237162.imp@bsdimp.com> <20090203155354.GC33520@dragon.NUXI.org> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:35:27 -0500 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org From: Garance A Drosehn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0) X-RPI-SA-Score: 0.10 () [Hold at 20.00] COMBINED_FROM X-CanItPRO-Stream: outgoing X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 128.113.2.226 Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r187132 - head/usr.bin/make X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:35:39 -0000 At 7:53 AM -0800 2/3/09, David O'Brien wrote: >On Mon, Feb 02, 2009, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > > It looks like the extra output assumes that each target is >> producing just a single line of output. That's pretty much what >> I expected would happen, and if so then the extra output doesn't >> really help all that much when it comes to debugging 'make -j'. > >No, there's a bug in our make. NetBSD's make gives the correct >output. Well, I'm thinking about an issue which (I believe) is separate from the bug, but I'll wait until that bug is fixed before I take another look at the update I wrote. Maybe I did more work than I needed to at the time. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = drosehn@rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@FreeBSD.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA