From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 14 17:32:46 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7466116A41B; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:32:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA6A13C45A; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:32:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9EHVjuW013777; Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:31:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:32:07 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20071014.113207.-432833794.imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <66400.1192378445@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <200710141045.l9EAjW4m058732@repoman.freebsd.org> <66400.1192378445@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, netchild@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile sensorsd.conf src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/rc.d Makefile sensorsd src/lib/libc/gen sysctl.3 src/sbin/sysctl sysctl.8 sysctl.c src/share/man/man5 rc.conf.5 src/share/man/man9 Makefile sensor_attach.9 src/sys/conf files ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:32:46 -0000 In message: <66400.1192378445@critter.freebsd.dk> "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: : In message <200710141045.l9EAjW4m058732@repoman.freebsd.org>, Alexander Leiding : er writes: : : > Log: : > Import OpenBSD's sysctl hardware sensors framework. : : I would like to register a complaint about this commit. : : When this was discussed I objected that this entire pile of crap does : not belong in the kernel. : : I still think this is a festering junkpile that does not belong in : the kernel, and that his should be backed out, until a proper : architectural solution has been found. : : Adding a new bogus type of device tree just because on cannot be : bothered to do things right, is the road that leads to things like : SYSV IPC and away from a sustainable architecture for an operating : system which is here for the long term. : : Please back this out. Seconded. I had a number of objects as well that seem to have been ignored. This is very bad form for a project that tries to work together by consensus. Warner