From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 18:28:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F0316A41C for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 18:28:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D6443D48 for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 18:28:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AA259514A1; Sun, 29 May 2005 11:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 11:28:26 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: "David P. Discher" Message-ID: <20050529182826.GA15632@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050529014005.GA11940@dragon.genyosha.net> <39BC3BAA-5FA5-4C28-B6B9-156D68DB6B0D@dpdtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <39BC3BAA-5FA5-4C28-B6B9-156D68DB6B0D@dpdtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Steve Rikli , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4 NFS install broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 18:28:28 -0000 --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 11:25:05AM -0700, David P. Discher wrote: > Well, not broken, but its does not look like it was documented. >=20 > I was just doing this yesterday, copied ISO #1 completely, then in cd#2 >=20 > # cd /iso2/packages ; tar -cf - | tar -xvf - -C /nfsinstall/=20 > packages >=20 > The file packages/INDEX needs to be updated. I don't know how > to create this, so I went the ftp servers, and grabbed the INDEX > from the combined release. What was wrong with the INDEX from the ISO image? > There is a PROBLEM WITH THIS INDEX file. There are TWO entries for > perl in it. Perl 5.6.2 and 5.8.2 I do believe. The two CD ISOs > only contained perl 5.8.2. Vi and delete the 5.6.2 line, and > this seemed to work. (Don't quote me on exact version numbers.) This isn't a problem, they are two different packages coming from two different ports. Why do you think it was a problem?=20 Kris --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCmgnKWry0BWjoQKURApfrAJ4r2sdY8F1ttbXHkM+BygMTed2GRQCgvG+H 8ZBMo/NfQnf17WgnTm/Ggpo= =LNf8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--