From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 4 07:07:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2A816A40F for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 07:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sunnzy@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE17B13C45B for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 07:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sunnzy@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so4765394uge for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:07:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=B7bAg0fXX8kfQ6PawFi+PF7BCvlRG8dJ+JhJmM/L0WFzwDQODncPNVMPtfK0KBhy/uXILHE8bBW4cUX6fYUc/nEYq2hbhW+HujVA83/JXvCOmDjIIqVDvl/i1xLVSC2aLXylom4nCZCB4ThHGJ75u2R50u9Ts5l1ylVRbq3S9OE= Received: by 10.67.89.5 with SMTP id r5mr27908355ugl.1167892948627; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:42:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.118.4 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 22:42:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:42:28 +1100 From: Sunnz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070103211426.GA60153@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070103211426.GA60153@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Subject: Re: Re: FreeBSD Installer vs RedHat Linux Fedora Core Installer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 07:07:50 -0000 2007/1/4, Jerry McAllister : > > > So, you won't get much sympathy on weaknesses in the installer that > only gets used twice per year and especially to make it more (ugghh gaaag) > microslothty. > Perhaps the stability of FBSD has led to the infrequent use of the installer for (re)installation. Think about it: if you are using the installer frequent enough to worry about how it look like, what are you doing? Reinstalling your OS every several months? On the other hand, the FBSD installer is very Microsoft-ly, the WinXP installer doesn't have any fancy graphics at first boot, where you do the partition/fs-format stuff - it only display a nice Microsoft Ad thing when it starts actually installing, which I always leave it by itself anyway.