From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 1 21:07:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADBC16A403 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F5A43D5A for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:07:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id kA1L7kfT077480; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 13:07:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 16:07:15 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20061027174544.2337A16A50B@hub.freebsd.org> <20061101131455.02E5.KEND@amigo.net> In-Reply-To: <20061101131455.02E5.KEND@amigo.net> X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*.<=?utf-8?q?of=5F4NrS=0A=09P*M/9CpxDo!D6?=)IY1w<9B1jB; tBQf[RU-R<,I)e"$q7N7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200611011607.15650.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Kenny Dail Subject: Re: ethernet port bondage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:07:52 -0000 On Wednesday 01 November 2006 15:52, Kenny Dail wrote: > I'm running 6.1 Release, and I've been looking for information on how to > bond multiple ethernet adaptors in one box so that if one card or > connection fails or is disconnected I still have network connectivity. Have a look at carp(4). It's a failover solution and not a bonding one, but it sounds like that's more what you're after anyway. JN