From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan  8 19:58:26 2009
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8049B106564A;
	Thu,  8 Jan 2009 19:58:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
	[128.131.111.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359168FC12;
	Thu,  8 Jan 2009 19:58:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6104039117;
	Thu,  8 Jan 2009 20:58:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix, from userid 1203)
	id 0B49F10059; Thu,  8 Jan 2009 20:58:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A1610054;
	Thu,  8 Jan 2009 20:58:28 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 20:58:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1231403223.51790.138.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.1.99.0901081120010.12007@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <200901071634.n07GYRXK032137@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4965494A.6070803@FreeBSD.org>
	<1231403223.51790.138.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.99 (LSU 1142 2008-08-13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/astro/nightfall Makefile
 ports/benchmarks/himenobench
 Makefile ports/benchmarks/hpl Makefile ports/biology/molden      Makefile
 ports/biology/ortep3 Makefile ports/biology/platon         Makefile
 ports/biology/psi88 Makefile ports/biology/tinker ...
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:58:27 -0000

On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Because all the fortran code must be recompiled against new and
> incompatible fortran library.

Yep.  Strictly speaking, only ports with USE_FORTRAN=yes that depend on 
some other port that has USE_FORTRAN=yes, or ports with USE_FORTRAN=yes 
which some  other port that has USE_FORTRAN=yes depends on would have
needed the bump (modulo potential additional "manual" dependencies).

I believe we do not have a reasonable way to determine such a cover, and
all those OPTIONS and knobs make this even more tricky.  And the result 
likely would have been pretty close to the full set anyway...

Gerald
-- 
Gerald (Jerry) Pfeifer   gerald@pfeifer.com   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/