Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:07:24 +0100 From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> To: Fernan Aguero <fernan@iib.unsam.edu.ar> Cc: Ying-Chieh Liao <ijliao@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proposal for a new ports category Message-ID: <3DE48B4C.5020601@liwing.de> References: <20021126065227.GC8665@marvin.bsdng.org> <20021126094110.GA16714@terry.dragon2.net> <20021126134749.GB3199@iib.unsam.edu.ar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Fernan Aguero wrote: > +----[ Esto dijo Ying-Chieh Liao (ijliao@FreeBSD.ORG): > | > | ports/tex/ may be a good idea > | but put all of CTAN packages into our ports tree is not :p > | > +----] > > Not all of CTAN ... perhaps some packages. Let people add > packages to ports as they see fit. After all, there are many > Perl packages/modules available as ports that are also part > of CPAN. Why discriminate the TeX ones? > > I agree with a separate category for TeX/LaTeX and friends. > > Fernan > That has discussed some month ago, too. The result was the idea to create a physical ports tree and build a logical basing on this (eg. ports/perl5/p5-Authen-PAM/ -> ports/security/) Jens To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DE48B4C.5020601>