From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sat Jul 8 22:57:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F243DA421A for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 22:57:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meyer.sydney@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wr0-x235.google.com (mail-wr0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6E926EC69 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2017 22:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meyer.sydney@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wr0-x235.google.com with SMTP id c11so91478426wrc.3 for ; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 15:57:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=3UCWT1VkpzS3p5o4TMI3Y9blyvdc+rF28ZJhh1ao+XI=; b=QKhTOo8TGXHiDcQf5gWfeM7CQxMeVXUI41cgHaO6C/iXh2kqiVxRkuIYG+ajIrkatq 1vInkYAjIdzoR304ztCpIJxts4k7NOCmD0CESM5vz4qWDD4D2fvjFQqQa/OR6mzMX9HA Nz9nf0Smw8wcJVsZ0p7XujjXwvue8mivgs+sgWtFbxqS9l+9f+rxaY1e0Q+asA1WfJIP dbV0PFWRwqyHFNGIEj88nP+pVqHpT/n+heL15eDUrTuzaBEN1PZVnyVcl/zsNc+ne/Gg /VlDRZ7l8/xFdyZx8jXVQqjc0jpCB39o6I6TT+5YXLSRSjBHfByuO0IZZTeoE6lABuS8 7qMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=3UCWT1VkpzS3p5o4TMI3Y9blyvdc+rF28ZJhh1ao+XI=; b=gQOG+F528sj96oxyGaCH141Ba3QVGrbW/eLmuF4ZcxJ2Wb77B+W9slxIAujO1psQSJ Ib+1YGWTvOHYOPNBCFub9kuFUbGH/wztVwaiaH/otSF0+KLKWB7278Dj5F3aZD7p2XKf fHhe72kzzsTkpgfW5eMOsc2YDj6oCSxYW3MPuN51G0nn+gGZKlvCU+0/q6V9gql8oyBW GSdFhAXcjLO5Fp5tI8m+lo1O5S3XnJHMsGMb5B7TiiRbgrehEj0B12SYF9KT6TOhG3A8 pRB4pT0z3eJdsl5PU3rCkWunAqVWx0FyK9GdcsZIwRdYJRx3c96oYqUVsBsjy5e4HLoq 1ALw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110YHqPNHFve2tktuWj9Gr3lzGi1bUpGeK1W9Pq0gTgvt/1TLeFC 8sQzK+1pwAlq+VQe2+k= X-Received: by 10.28.13.145 with SMTP id 139mr3202708wmn.49.1499554633897; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 15:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.13.0.1] ([87.67.252.33]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u75sm11530902wmd.1.2017.07.08.15.57.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 08 Jul 2017 15:57:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Sydney Meyer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: VirtualBox outbound networking Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2017 00:57:11 +0200 References: <201707082233.v68MXZcM055411@mail.karels.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <201707082233.v68MXZcM055411@mail.karels.net> Message-Id: <0FE43678-63BD-4A46-806B-8964580EE34F@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 22:57:16 -0000 Hi Mike, yes, a (correct) default route is added and the guest can reach the = VirtualBox nat-gateway.. oddly enough, the VirtualBox DHCP server seems = to have passed the hosts resolv.conf and is able to dig dns responses = with my local-lan dns resolver, but can't ping it. When a guest digs to my routers dns service, i can see the packets on = the router coming from hosts IP address, i.e. nat working, but when i = try to ping it the router, i can't see any packets, neither on the host = nor on the remote site. =20 =20 > On 9. Jul 2017, at 00:33, Mike Karels wrote: >=20 >> That is, e.g. in "NAT" mode VirtualBox' own DHCP server hands out = addresses to guest, which are in turn able to ping the host but can't = get outside their own networks. >=20 >> I'm sorry for not mentioning this in the first post. >=20 > Are you getting a default route from the (virtual) DHCP server? If = not, > can you add one manually? I can attest that the route is working with > 10.3, but probably you have even more recent experience. >=20 > Mike