Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:46:45 +1100 (EST) From: "Tim Clewlow" <tim@clewlow.org> To: xorquewasp@googlemail.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Simulating bad network conditions Message-ID: <2294403bfa2d98673c5d5748496a6d64.squirrel@192.168.1.100> In-Reply-To: <20090218085715.GA9821@logik.internal.network> References: <20090218083424.GA62198@logik.internal.network> <20090218114128.B73352@mp2.macomnet.net> <20090218085715.GA9821@logik.internal.network>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Here is a link to a mailing list post about a patch to give dummynet support in pf. It is _fairly_ recent and so may still be a little buggy, but the poster seems quite confident that it works as intended. http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-pf@freebsd.org/msg03857.html Cheers, Tim. > On 2009-02-18 11:42:00, Maxim Konovalov wrote: >> >> ipfw(8) prob + dummynet(8). >> > > Hi. Thanks for the quick response. > > Is there, by any chance, an equivalent for PF? I see there's 'ALTQ' > but it looks to be poorly supported (unless I misunderstand). I have > quite a complicated setup here with PF forwarding and jails and I'm > not sure how well ipfw will play along. > > thanks, > xw
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2294403bfa2d98673c5d5748496a6d64.squirrel>