From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 5 22:40:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org (sf3-74.ppp.wenet.net [206.15.84.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E661558E for ; Mon, 5 Apr 1999 22:40:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (garbanzo@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA89458; Mon, 5 Apr 1999 22:38:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 22:38:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Zepeda To: Matthew Dillon Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: EGCS optimizations In-Reply-To: <199904060525.WAA04269@apollo.backplane.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > There is nothing beyond -O2. Well, there's -O3, which tries to > inline static functions, but that typically isn't beneficial because > it really bloats up the code and subroutine calls on intel cpus are > very fast. Really? The pgcc web page (goof.com/pcg) lead me to believe that there were a few more optimizations turned on by -O5 && -O6.. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message