From owner-freebsd-chat Fri May 23 16:32:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA24276 for chat-outgoing; Fri, 23 May 1997 16:32:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carlton.innotts.co.uk (root@carlton.innotts.co.uk [194.176.128.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA24269 for ; Fri, 23 May 1997 16:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [194.176.130.42] (serialA29.innotts.co.uk [194.176.130.42]) by carlton.innotts.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA20526; Sat, 24 May 1997 00:31:54 +0100 (BST) X-Sender: robmel@mailhost.innotts.co.uk Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199705232314.TAA20817@ethanol.gnu.ai.mit.edu> References: (message from Robin Melville on Fri, 23 May 1997 21:18:38 +0100) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 00:31:52 +0100 To: joelh@gnu.ai.mit.edu From: Robin Melville Subject: Re: Cluster Computing in BSD Cc: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 12:14 am +0100 24/5/97, Joel Ray Holveck wrote: >>>JFS for reliability, not for speed I hope... I've always found JFS slower >>>than anything else. >>Like everything Mac, I suppose. Surprising really considering the >>speed of the chip. I suppose they have a Microsoft spy in place who >>places timing loops in everything without telling anybody 8-) > >I thought that JFS was AIX, not MacOS. Mac Unix, not MacOS rob.