From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Dec 20 14:47:35 2000 From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 20 14:47:33 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.163.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B16D37B400; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:47:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42]) by sj-msg-core-1.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA13787; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:47:41 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eBKMlWt28110; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:47:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200012202247.eBKMlWt28110@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: sheldonh@freebsd.org Cc: bmah@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Old entities in man-refs.ent From: bmah@freebsd.org (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@freebsd.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1649082448P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:47:31 -0800 Sender: bmah@cisco.com Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --==_Exmh_1649082448P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Sheldon-- I noticed that you did two commits to man-refs.ent that removed the entities for svr4(8) and linux(8) because the scripts they were describing are obsolete. I'm in a situation where I'd kind of like them back for two reasons: 1. They're still very much present (for better or worse) in 4-STABLE. 2. It's a little harder to write a DocBook document saying "svr4(8) was removed" if the entity isn't there. I'm wondering if you'd consider letting me put the svr4(8) and linux(8) entries back, as well as adding one for osf1(8)? (If the answer's "no", I can live with that. I can always write the entry out long-hand, even though it's not as aesthetically pleasing to me.) Thanks! Bruce. --==_Exmh_1649082448P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE6QTcD2MoxcVugUsMRAhtSAJ4x9OGQ3K2s2GjEvsMqFPBUunObdwCg5vM6 PHxt8Zy2xM8Pa4Jkty1Y8fE= =baqr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1649082448P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message