Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Jun 1995 07:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk>
To:        rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes)
Cc:        mark@grondar.za, wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Crypt code summary(2).
Message-ID:  <199506261450.HAA15673@freefall.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: <199506260910.CAA03201@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 26, 95 02:10:10 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > That certainly is a possibility. It is not _my_ #1 choice, though.
> > 
> > I going to counter Garrett, and say:  Put it in the main branch.
> 
> I am going to counter Poul, and agree with Garrett, and give reasons
> for doing so.
> 
> a)  It is very likely to change as RFC's get done to cover this and
>     we will more or less be forced to rip out what ever we had done
>     to implement what is in the RFCs.

SSL is implemented in NetScape.  It's unlikely to change at all.

I already stated my argumentes earlier.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Just that: dried leaves in boiling water ?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506261450.HAA15673>