Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 07:50:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk> To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes) Cc: mark@grondar.za, wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Crypt code summary(2). Message-ID: <199506261450.HAA15673@freefall.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: <199506260910.CAA03201@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 26, 95 02:10:10 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > That certainly is a possibility. It is not _my_ #1 choice, though. > > > > I going to counter Garrett, and say: Put it in the main branch. > > I am going to counter Poul, and agree with Garrett, and give reasons > for doing so. > > a) It is very likely to change as RFC's get done to cover this and > we will more or less be forced to rip out what ever we had done > to implement what is in the RFCs. SSL is implemented in NetScape. It's unlikely to change at all. I already stated my argumentes earlier. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Just that: dried leaves in boiling water ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506261450.HAA15673>