From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar  4 13:42:29 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E6D16A420;
	Sat,  4 Mar 2006 13:42:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C0643D6B;
	Sat,  4 Mar 2006 13:42:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua)
Received: from [212.40.38.87] (oddity-e.topspin.kiev.ua [212.40.38.87])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id PAA00135;
	Sat, 04 Mar 2006 15:42:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua)
Message-ID: <44099935.6040205@icyb.net.ua>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 15:42:13 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060222)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dirk Meyer <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org>
References: <43FEFD30.2080605@icyb.net.ua> <7397fGT8Ff@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
In-Reply-To: <7397fGT8Ff@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-U
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: danfe@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: GNUSTEP_PREFIX not in bsd.gnustep.mk ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:42:29 -0000

on 04/03/2006 11:02 Dirk Meyer said the following:
> Andriy Gapon schrieb:,
>> Wouldn't it be reasonable to define some default value for this variable
>> in ports/Mk/bsd.gnustep.mk ? For example many ports have to have the
>> following line now:
>> GNUSTEP_PREFIX?=${LOCALBASE}/GNUstep
>> (please note ?= operator)
> 
> No. This changes where for some reason,
> they allows ports like ruby-gnustep and others bindings
> to use bsd.gnustep.mk with the default prefix.

I don't get it. devel/ruby-gnustep/Makefile has:
GNUSTEP_PREFIX?=        ${LOCALBASE}/GNUstep

Also:
$ glimpse -l GNUSTEP_PREFIX > gpref.lst
$ glimpse -l USE_GNUSTEP > gstep.lst
$ diff -U 0 gpref.lst gstep.lst
--- gpref.lst   Sat Mar  4 15:31:04 2006
+++ gstep.lst   Sat Mar  4 15:31:23 2006
@@ -1,0 +2,1 @@
+/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk
@@ -3,0 +6 @@
+/usr/ports/devel/portmk/Mk/bsd.port.mk
@@ -27,0 +31,3 @@
+/usr/ports/Tools/scripts/portsvar.sh
+/usr/ports/games/oolite/Makefile
+/usr/ports/graphics/cenon/Makefile

Also:
$ glimpse -h 'GNUSTEP_PREFIX.*=' | sort -u
GNUSTEP_PREFIX?=        ${LOCALBASE}/GNUstep
MAKE_ARGS+=     GNUSTEP_PREFIX=${PREFIX}/System

This basically means that every port depending on GNUstep (except for
those two that were originally missed) has
GNUSTEP_PREFIX?=        ${LOCALBASE}/GNUstep
line in its Makefile.
So, I'd like to suggest again to put this line into bsd.gnustep.mk,
instead of having it in each of the ports in question.

Did I misunderstood or misinterpret something ?

-- 
Andriy Gapon