From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 7 14:56:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD0C106573B; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from smtp.timeweb.ru (smtp.timeweb.ru [217.170.79.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F315B8FC1F; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 14:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from [213.148.20.85] (helo=hive.panopticon) by smtp.timeweb.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LrCjB-0008VK-GQ; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:56:41 +0400 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.32]) by hive.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093A31162F; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:56:49 +0400 (MSD) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6D93C10883A; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:56:24 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:56:24 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Alexander Churanov Message-ID: <20090407145624.GA64876@hades.panopticon> References: <3cb459ed0903270809s2da0fce7i66686a176d369931@mail.gmail.com> <20090331230246.GN1964@hades.panopticon> <20090401113857.GO1964@hades.panopticon> <3cb459ed0904020821u3051c572l6461274ae7ff118b@mail.gmail.com> <20090402224413.GV1964@hades.panopticon> <3cb459ed0904030632x215f1e3n25363903a80b5639@mail.gmail.com> <20090403155011.GC60788@hades.panopticon> <3cb459ed0904070728w162d56dey1359c65c2394635d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3cb459ed0904070728w162d56dey1359c65c2394635d@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Jeremy Messenger , lwhsu@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of devel/boost upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:56:42 -0000 * Alexander Churanov (alexanderchuranov@gmail.com) wrote: > As I see everybody agrees on splitting boost into several ports and on > Boost.Python beeing a separate port. Let's proceed with option #2 > ("jam", "libs", "python-libs" and "docs"). > > Personally, I like the idea #4 of having source-libs and a port per a > shared library. I'd like to have another discussion on that when some > statistics on boost usage in ports is ready. > > I have questions on how to perform this task: > > 1) Given that port freeze starts on 13th, are there any chances to > have boost-1.38 splitted into several packages in 7.2-RELEASE? We still have time till the end of week, if we ask pav@ to do exp-run right now and there are few to none failures, you can try. > 2) Is is permitted to test patch for updating to 1.38 with some ports, > not with all that depend on boost and then file a PR, specifying which We'll need an exp-run for it anyway, so I guess it's OK. If you have a patch ready, I suggest to file a PR and mail pav@ to do exp-run for it. If there are no major failures, we can push it into the tree, else we won't be bored during the freeze fixing it. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru