Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:34:37 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: jack.ren@intel.com, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About the memory barrier in BSD libc Message-ID: <201204241334.37580.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120424165842.GZ2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20120423084120.GD76983@zxy.spb.ru> <201204241110.14017.jhb@freebsd.org> <20120424165842.GZ2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday, April 24, 2012 12:58:42 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:10:13AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > Could you move the extern and THREAD_LOCK/UNLOCK macros into the stdio > > private header file? > > This requires more glue because spinlock.h is separate from libc_private.h. > I also added a comment trying to explain why assignment is braced with lock. This looks great, thanks! -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201204241334.37580.jhb>