From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Dec  6 20:21:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E8D37B41A
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu,  6 Dec 2001 20:21:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26])
	by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4D2914CE2C; Thu,  6 Dec 2001 23:21:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46])
	by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA03730;
	Thu, 6 Dec 2001 23:21:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Received: (from fenner@localhost)
	by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id UAA07833;
	Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:21:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200112070421.UAA07833@windsor.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: freebsd@hoolan.org
Subject: Re: UDP checksum error after encapsulating multicast packet
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 20:21:30 -0800
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.2j/makemail 2.9b
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


>However, there does exist one case that have good checksum, no matter I 
>apply the patch or not.

Is the local system a member of one or the other of these groups?
i.e. does it work when the local system is a member, or not, or
is that not a predictor of the behavior?

  Bill

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message