From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Tue Aug 7 09:51:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B7A10559C3 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C059A86A6C for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 838D910559C0; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E4510559BE for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04AE486A69 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 512BC1DCD0 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:51:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w779pnW4007799 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:51:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w779pnQ3007798 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 09:51:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230432] [NEW PORT] net/ceph13: Ceph delivers object, block, and file storage in a unified system (Mimic 13.x) Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 09:51:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status keywords cc flagtypes.name short_desc bug_severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 09:51:51 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230432 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open Keywords| |feature, needs-qa CC| |wjw@digiware.nl Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(wjw@di | |giware.nl) Summary|net/ceph13: First version |[NEW PORT] net/ceph13: Ceph |of the Mimic release |delivers object, block, and |(v13.2.1) |file storage in a unified | |system (Mimic 13.x) Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People --- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak --- You may want to consider copying net/ceph to net/ceph12, and upgrading net/= ceph through to 13.* if there is an upgrade path there. It's fairly standard for= the 'main' port to always be the latest release branch. Alternatively, if dual major branches will be supported going forward, one = may consider moving net/ceph -> net/ceph12, and create a new net/ceph13. Which is the better option depends on a few things, such as dependency complexity, upgrade-ability experience/process through major versions. Can you also confirm that this port passes QA please (portlint, poudriere a= t a minimum) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=