Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:31:54 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Cc: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" <stephen@missouri.edu> Subject: Re: Problems with linking on FreeBSD-10 Message-ID: <201401311532.s0VFVssk037895@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:19:46 GMT." <52EAEC1D.9040502@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The failure is when using FreeBSD-10. With FreeBSD-8 it works great. I Building ports on 10.0-RELEASE is lots more trouble than 9.2-RELEASE. 10.0-RELEASE built 874, & 9.2-RELEASE built 953 & still making, with http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/jhs/*/Makefile.local cd /usr/ports/packages/All ; /bin/ls -1 | wc -l 10.0-RELEASE has 40 DUDS, & 9.2-RELEASE has 7 DUDS so far in http://www.berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/src/jhs/etc/csh.cshrc.master Lot of broken ports in 10.0-RELEASE are cc errors, (Clang, 9.2 was gcc). Some are Stage failures. New tools breaking, typical of a .0 release. I was tempted to 10 by man urtwn (4) (WLAN), but then 10 src/ ripped out bind, & 10.0 ports wasted time to delivered less. 9.2-RELEASE is better. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Interleave replies below like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201401311532.s0VFVssk037895>