From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 14:20:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kci.kciLink.com (kci.kciLink.com [204.117.82.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B2737B8DA for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:20:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kcilink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [204.117.82.2]) by kci.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AAEE8A8; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:20:49 -0500 (EST) Received: (from khera@localhost) by onceler.kcilink.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA22889; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:20:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from khera@kci.kcilink.com) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14513.47681.137038.821262@onceler.kcilink.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:20:49 -0500 (EST) To: Doug Barton Cc: "Adam D. Marks" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd? In-Reply-To: <38B1B5D2.1478C9D2@gorean.org> References: <38B1B5D2.1478C9D2@gorean.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 8) "Bryce Canyon" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "DB" == Doug Barton writes: DB> "Adam D. Marks" wrote: >> >> I was curious if it is posible to have different inetd configurations for >> different network interfaces. DB> No, it's not. You could accomplish the same thing by enabling all of the DB> services you want in inetd.conf and then restricting access to those ports Then what's the -a parameter to inetd for? Why not just run two different inetd's bound to different IP addresses, one for each interface? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message