From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 16:24:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73C6667F; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (gw.catspoiler.org [75.1.14.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5505F10B7; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id s84GMm0g093821; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:22:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201409041622.s84GMm0g093821@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:22:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: svn commit: r271076 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 amd64/include i386/i386 i386/include pc98/pc98 To: jhb@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <4450256.opGGntPoIk@ralph.baldwin.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 16:24:19 -0000 On 4 Sep, John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, September 03, 2014 07:37:21 PM Don Lewis wrote: >> On 4 Sep, John Baldwin wrote: >> > Author: jhb >> > Date: Thu Sep 4 01:46:06 2014 >> > New Revision: 271076 >> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/271076 >> > >> > Log: >> > - Move the declaration of has_f00f_hack out of identcpu.c to machdep.c. >> >> That certainly brings back memories ... > > Hopefully not too traumatic. :-P Not really. I remember the general sense of panic when the vulnerability was announced and then the sense of relief when the workaround was found. After that, I got lots of reminders because of the boot message. I've still got the old hardware and am often tempted to see if it will run a recent version of FreeBSD. I don't think I want to know how long it would take to run buildworld post-clang.