Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 23:41:39 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org>, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/devel/icu: PTHREAD_LIBS clean Message-ID: <20061209234139.2bcb88fe.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200611291052.23327@aldan> References: <20061127222709.aa35ab22.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200611290957.26508@aldan> <44irgyjlyf.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <200611291052.23327@aldan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:52:22 -0500 Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> wrote: > I know. And the ICU developers think, threads should be enabled by default. > The reason they aren't right now -- in the FreeBSD port -- is because of > certain bugs in thread implementation(s) on FreeBSD/ia64, which lead to > crashes in ICU. > Since nothing is using ICU in a multi-threaded fashion _right now_, the > current version of the port builds without threads by default. Norikatsu > confirms, he is not calling into ICU from multiple threads either, hence my > suggestion, he does not need to change the option. I just hope to respect PTHREAD_LIBS. But if you hope no thread feature, I don't use thread feature and test it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061209234139.2bcb88fe.nork>