Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Sep 2007 20:56:34 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Maxim Khitrov <mkhitrov@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Building a new workstation - dual or quad-core CPU for FreeBSD 7?
Message-ID:  <20070916205620.K66844@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <26ddd1750709141351i3646e9bdg8d8b7e93461167f9@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <26ddd1750709141351i3646e9bdg8d8b7e93461167f9@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Windows XP, which will be primarily used for gaming, and FreeBSD 7.0
> for everything else. I wanted to ask if the new ULE scheduler will
> benefit from having four cores on the CPU, meaning that if I have many
> concurrent tasks, is it able to efficiently spread the load over all
> available cores?

won't standard schedules do the same?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070916205620.K66844>