From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 28 11:58:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A000106564A for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:58:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe01.c2i.net [212.247.154.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6368FC0A for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:58:17 +0000 (UTC) X-T2-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED Received: from [188.126.198.129] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe01.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with ESMTPA id 235284084; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:58:15 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:56:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20120123.171246.321689433999174416.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> <20120124.095329.1799630236416551619.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> <20120128.205339.1305564732068259146.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> In-Reply-To: <20120128.205339.1305564732068259146.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> X-Face: 'mmZ:T{)),Oru^0c+/}w'`gU1$ubmG?lp!=R4Wy\ELYo2)@'UZ24N@d2+AyewRX}mAm; Yp |U[@, _z/([?1bCfM{_"B<.J>mICJCHAzzGHI{y7{%JVz%R~yJHIji`y>Y}k1C4TfysrsUI -%GU9V5]iUZF&nRn9mJ'?&>O MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201281256.13847.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Kohji Okuno Subject: Re: Is UPS_PORT_POWER wrong? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:58:18 -0000 On Saturday 28 January 2012 12:53:39 Kohji Okuno wrote: > Hi HPS, > > Do you have better idea? > It might be we should implement a separate control request to get the information we need? Though that needs to be standardized. What do you think about that? --HPS