Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 18:37:33 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> To: miwi@FreeBSD.org Cc: skreuzer@FreeBSD.org, zope@freebsd.org, Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org>, python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] python2.4 removal zope and zope211 affected Message-ID: <4FC4DF2D.8040807@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <20120529070211.1308b19d.miwi@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120528174458.5300cfbd.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4FC3B25A.2020004@yandex.ru> <CAKBkRUxb-o1a0CH1eO7Sp31ZMmfEuOe6SuJK0p5Y7CB=cqOfMg@mail.gmail.com> <20120529070211.1308b19d.miwi@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Martin, Martin Wilke wrote on 29.05.2012 03:02: > Nope, we have already mention that ever and ever and ever again, this > time i dont do that where a problem with that is this time not mine, > the python@ histroy can prove that. I wont postpone it again!!!! As I said already, I have no objections and actually all I did in past it's a dropping python24/25 support in ports :). Expiring before deleting it's a common practice. And to me it's not a technical aspect, but our users awareness and loyalty aspect. > +1 for py25 removal.. since is the same situation.. So let's get them out both in a row. I think that holding 25 is more pointless, than ever holding 24. > Will fix the patch Ok, thank you. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC4DF2D.8040807>