From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 26 06:59:32 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id GAA23135 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 26 Dec 1996 06:59:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from grackle.grondar.za (bNfrLIMdorlxvt+gyRUQjKvRZGy9duBz@grackle.grondar.za [196.7.18.131]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id GAA23124 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 1996 06:59:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from grackle.grondar.za (a3agxPpdmWnNbceYz3YWRFXOGeQVBczG@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grackle.grondar.za (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA15514; Thu, 26 Dec 1996 16:59:04 +0200 (SAT) Message-Id: <199612261459.QAA15514@grackle.grondar.za> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0beta 12/23/96 To: Adam David cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami), freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk on freefall Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 26 Dec 1996 16:59:00 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Adam David wrote: > > But freefall is not a ports build machine! ;) > > I would still like to be able to fetch and checksum there without taking a > detour to thud. Is this unreasonable? Why do you not just do the " make makesum" on your machine before you bring the port to Freefall? > That is a lot of unnecessary work for a 1-line change to the Makefile when > the new version has already been tested elsewhere. Perfect excuse to build the checksum at home, too. M -- Mark Murray PGP key fingerprint = 80 36 6E 40 83 D6 8A 36 This .sig is umop ap!sdn. BC 06 EA 0E 7A F2 CE CE