Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:34:15 -0500 From: Jeremy Faulkner <gldisater@gmail.com> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 11-STABLE vs 11.0-RELENG test Message-ID: <27722817-5d5f-69f9-385f-57df1a470b9c@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <d2e6b5d1-3ccd-7aaf-b106-a7e7d97fcb69@FreeBSD.org> References: <8b4ba98d-03d3-f671-33b2-ed12d3b4fb7c@FreeBSD.org> <374b6d16-5cb4-9338-ec1d-65ad93ca29dc@FreeBSD.org> <CAJjvXiE3aaG-Eb1Q_3RQ3zony0jUqoVDzEkrD6AC%2BJ_r9VVc0g@mail.gmail.com> <d2e6b5d1-3ccd-7aaf-b106-a7e7d97fcb69@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2017-03-06 1:52 PM, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 06.03.2017 20:11, Matthew Ahrens wrote: >> FYI - I am changing this sorting to be based on the bookmark (objset, >> object, level, blkid) instead of timestamp. This normally doesn't >> change the performance on illumos, but it should fix this on FreeBSD >> (and it ensures that the multi-threaded spa_sync doesn't degrade >> performance). >> >> Here's the PR; you can pick out the "sort by bookmark" commit if you want: >> >> https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/138 > > Thank you for the notice, but we already have alike patch in a tree for > few months to address the mentioned issue: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=309714 > > We'll just replace one patch with another when yours comes in to reduce > the code divergence. > This has not been MFC'd yet. Jeremy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27722817-5d5f-69f9-385f-57df1a470b9c>