Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 03:33:26 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: stephen@missouri.edu Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USE_TEX question Message-ID: <20130510.033326.1298049919531988430.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <518BDE81.3060008@missouri.edu> References: <518BDE81.3060008@missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Fri_May_10_03_33_26_2013_588)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu> wrote in <518BDE81.3060008@missouri.edu>: st> So I have a port, math/sage, which now contains in Makefile the line st> USE_TEX= tetex st> st> I have intalled the texlive ports. So now if I try to install st> math/sage, it gives me error messages about CONFLICTS, which I think st> arise from the fact that math/sage thinks that it has to first install st> tetex, and this conflict with various texlive ports. st> st> But, math/sage is TEX agnostic. It doesn't care whether it is tetex st> or texlive that is installed. All it really wants to know is if there st> is a useable latex in PATH. st> st> It would be nice if there was a USE_TEX=yes option, or something like st> that, which I could put into the math/sage port. It is possible after r317744, but please wait until problem reports about the TeXLive ports are quieted down first. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Fri_May_10_03_33_26_2013_588)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlGL6/YACgkQTyzT2CeTzy1qwQCg0BcB1fxCKBQk5ecKSiJdTxL7 60UAn2K0V7VJAC4l8jt4iMlV8hcBag++ =Du5R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Fri_May_10_03_33_26_2013_588)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130510.033326.1298049919531988430.hrs>