From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 13:30:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21A9C7C9 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x234.google.com (mail-pa0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E79BD1827 for ; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id eu11so24050031pac.25 for ; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 06:30:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2VSDrumFCmNsbo3lyYiJNqczsc23v/TtSBFJAzD69SM=; b=RVyn4w6DnrAMCDt5zqnWfz0UtqTpJaZ6vqviY6WqdRuSp602uJG1irlRjAE26/eI/6 5t7oAoURhj7Y/WaUtL5O1gyEnTai7fwHA+409W8BFchzevUjNeLvI8kejeFp3wBYqcBR LD/8YH2g16O75EXTaHF/FBa7aYPgUsBHCxb/nrbcK0LcDX3nPi1XyCLiKkaUaM/D/IOO um/MMsgKK88GyL+9BoEUzT8h9j3FUbGt178SBDpMPoD/YGz6yFX+EbGtkpmp+G52Il2s Kv3RP8244Xf7xGBgpI9y9qq0yT8FNB4E688efoHZgVRa8jOxQAXgTwjLl0oYvyfhvgYk SrRA== X-Received: by 10.68.253.34 with SMTP id zx2mr2851312pbc.152.1410010257606; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 06:30:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (ppp59-167-128-11.static.internode.on.net. [59.167.128.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id oy9sm4409042pdb.54.2014.09.06.06.30.55 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Sep 2014 06:30:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <540B0C87.9070005@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 23:30:47 +1000 From: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/32.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Smith , Christoph Moench-Tegeder Subject: Re: Needs triage .. References: <20140906221516.Q58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20140906125502.GA1892@elch.exwg.net> <20140906230043.H58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20140906230043.H58647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 13:30:58 -0000 On 6/09/2014 11:23 PM, Ian Smith wrote: > On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 14:55:03 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > > ## Ian Smith (smithi@nimnet.asn.au): > > > > > Are these just getting auto-assigned to stable@? Can anyone play? :) > > > > The submitter explicitly adds stable@ to the bug's Cc list. > > Yes, and this submitter hasn't posted in the dozen lists I take, since > May anyway. This may save someone having to assign a bug, but perhaps > one shouldn't earn the 'mayCC' bit until some N>0 have been assigned? > > > But anyways, looking at the amount of panics he reports, most of which > > happen on rather trivial actions (as far as I can tell from my sampling > > of reports), this looks like bad hardware. > > If anyone with a hat could tell the sasamotikomi? > > I'm more concerned about process (vs PRs) and bulk spam potential than > the reporting methods of any one submitter; bugzilla is overall cool. > > cheers, Ian Ian, Please create an issue report assigned to bugmeister, with 'keyword: feature' describing the issue, and thoughts on different ways you can think of a mechanism potentially working. -- Kubilay for Bugmeister