From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 23:25:55 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D29E16A46B for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:25:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.thoenen@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp113.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com (smtp113.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.102.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC6DE13C45D for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.thoenen@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 5877 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2007 23:25:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=c6ZJlcD2I9mcmHOPT7YysqE0MrgiNIYrxvlBcJ4qcSCj24y7zVeNOAYXhd63a2LR7oc2tsBfghnzZAo5Nezz4/zhxS9I7L5gtvRPrtFvm7fzQXaA9tzhc8gCXG5qB9AkejgtCUW76IzKpb5kob17S5iWJR4Pil6Z31tviD0zG4M= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ssfbsd.securestate.org) (eol1@70.227.5.28 with plain) by smtp113.plus.mail.re1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2007 23:25:48 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: F6_kY7sVM1mkW_nSx0.yMj_Zlc9rSm8D9ilNofuEbpcqarzwi1dlHfm6ePn6XX43y7kTv9PQbg-- Message-ID: <476310FB.9030502@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:25:47 -0500 From: Peter Thoenen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pav@FreeBSD.org References: <4762F772.8050409@yahoo.com> <1197670107.1838.15.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <1197670107.1838.15.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Rarian (wants scrollkeeper) X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:25:55 -0000 Hmm ... I see that now .. the odd thing here though was Gnome 2.20.1 (after that UPDATING entry) was a FRESH INSTALL (upgrading to 2.20.2) so shouldn't have hit this problem correct? -Peter