From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 31 15:31:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEE316A4CE; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:31:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CF343D2D; Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:31:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from ob.icann.org ([192.0.35.106]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <2003123123313001200lajuie> (Authid: domain_name_tsar); Wed, 31 Dec 2003 23:31:30 +0000 Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:31:28 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: Gregory Neil Shapiro In-Reply-To: <200312311742.hBVHgGb2051373@repoman.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20031231152909.U1441@bo.vpnaa.bet> References: <200312311742.hBVHgGb2051373@repoman.freebsd.org> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: "cvs-src@FreeBSD.org" cc: "src-committers@FreeBSD.org" cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: "cvs-all@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/sendmail freebsd.mc X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 23:31:33 -0000 On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > gshapiro 2003/12/31 09:42:16 PST > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > etc/sendmail freebsd.mc > Log: > MFC: Enable IPv6 by default but make it optional so it doesn't affect > sites without IPv6. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.29 +3 -3 src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc Greg, What happens if I have a RELENG_4 system, with no IPv6 enabled, and I mergemaster this change into my system? If everything keeps working with no errors, then I think enabling this by default is probably ok. If not, then I'd be concerned that this violotes the charter for -stable. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection