From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 17 14:50:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449651065675 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BF78FC0A for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o4HEo3hD011341 for ; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o4HEo3st011340; Mon, 17 May 2010 14:50:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:50:03 GMT Message-Id: <201005171450.o4HEo3st011340@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Antony Mawer Cc: Subject: Re: kern/120749: [request] Suggest upping the default kern.ps_arg_cache_limit X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Antony Mawer List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 14:50:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/120749; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Antony Mawer To: Jille Timmermans Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, trasz@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/120749: [request] Suggest upping the default kern.ps_arg_cache_limit Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 23:37:30 +1000 There was some recent comments that suggested this was beneficial with various Tomcat/Java applications, which otherwise experienced their command lines being truncated in the rc.d script for tomcat. What is the trade of increasing this - increased memory usage? -- Antony On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Jille Timmermans wrote: > Can't we better start a discussion about this? > If we deassign it we will be quite sure it will remain there forever. > > I don't think it is really usefull as it is already adjustable by `sysctl > kern.ps_arg_cache_limit=1024` and nobody really seems to care. > > > -- Jille > Ps, I have not looked back in the archives whether this was already > discussed; as there was no followup and I'm lazy. > > Op 17-5-2010 14:12, trasz@freebsd.org schreef: >> >> Synopsis: [request] Suggest upping the default kern.ps_arg_cache_limit >> >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-arch->freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org >> Responsible-Changed-By: trasz >> Responsible-Changed-When: Mon May 17 12:11:08 UTC 2010 >> Responsible-Changed-Why: >> Deassign; mail to arch@ every month is annoying. >> >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=120749 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >