From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 22 13:44:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C456A16A426; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:44:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037B043D46; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:44:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5DA3F.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.218.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0MDaNS5090569; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:36:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0MDhrQl087386; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:43:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:43:53 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Yar Tikhiy Message-ID: <20060122144353.0cb97c33@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20060122075406.GB91663@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <200601212251.k0LMpeom029908@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060121233937.GC83922@FreeBSD.org> <20060122075406.GB91663@comp.chem.msu.su> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Gleb Smirnoff , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src ObsoleteFiles.inc UPDATING X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:44:33 -0000 On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:54:07 +0300 Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:39:37AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:51:40PM +0000, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > Y> yar 2006-01-21 22:51:40 UTC > > Y> > > Y> FreeBSD src repository > > Y> > > Y> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6) > > Y> . ObsoleteFiles.inc UPDATING > > Y> Log: > > Y> MFC: > > Y> Record renaming rc.d/ppp-user to rc.d/ppp. > > Y> > > Y> Revision Changes Path > > Y> 1.25.2.2 +2 -0 src/ObsoleteFiles.inc > > Y> 1.416.2.14 +5 -0 src/UPDATING > > > > If I don't mistake, when this thins was committed to HEAD, > > someone noticed, that /etc is mergemaster's area, and > > files from /etc should not be listed in ObsoleteFiles.inc. > > There are quite a few /etc files still listed in ObsoleteFiles.inc. > Was there a consensus on this issue? In my opinion, mergemaster > just predated ObsoleteFiles.inc in this area. We are trying to > make /etc contents uniform across different installations, with > local configuration files going to /usr/local/etc, so there's nothing > wrong in listing defunct /etc files in ObsoleteFiles.inc. The consensus was, that it doesn't hurt. Implicit assumption: if someone does delete-old (following the documented update procedure), he also runs mergemaster (following the documented update procedure). If someone does not follow the documented update procedure, he should not complain if he shoots himself into a foot. Since an user has to agree to every file delete-old wants to remove (except he runs it in batch-mode, but then this sentence still applies), the user already expressed his knowledge about what he does (sort of)... so: don't moan if you break something, there are enough warning messages. Bye, Alexander. -- It's not a bug, it's tradition! http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 WL http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/registry/1FZ4DTHQE9PQ8/ref=wl_em_to/