Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 22:00:22 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230888] Missing 64 bit atomic functions for i386 (libatomic) Message-ID: <bug-230888-29464-0E1ssrbCrp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-230888-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-230888-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230888 Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tijl@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #34 from Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #32) For the old gcc you will probably have to use the __sync_* builtins as in o= ur stdatomic.h. But I think there's a problem with the implementation in compiler_rt. Clang generates functions calls to compiler_rt if it can't in= line __c11_atomic_* (e.g. if the architecture only guarantees atomicity if an ob= ject is properly aligned and a given object isn't aligned) so how can compiler_rt then use __c11_atomic_*? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-230888-29464-0E1ssrbCrp>