Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:11:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Juszczak <matt@atopia.net> To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Ulrich_Sp=F6rlein?= <uqs@spoerlein.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Make package-recursive problem Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905241410340.66921@pluto.atopia.net> In-Reply-To: <20090524152124.GA16591@acme.spoerlein.net> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905221212090.81580@pluto.atopia.net> <20090524152124.GA16591@acme.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I have no clue as to what is causing this, but this is probably the > reason why people use the tinderbox or roll their own system to build > consistent packages. I feel like I am though? I have a dedicated box just for building packages. make package creates a tbz file of all packages, and is supposed to be reliable. > Another approach had even the package dependency inside a Makefile, so > rebuilding the gettext package would trigger all dependent packages to > get rebuilt too (I haven't tackled the problem of *reinstalling* them on > the target hosts, though) Doesn't this already occur with the default tools in the port system?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0905241410340.66921>