Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 20:37:44 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: d@delphij.net, delphij@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why default route is not installed last? Message-ID: <20130826.203744.2304902117196747104.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <521670FF.6080407@delphij.net> References: <521670FF.6080407@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Aug_26_20_37_44_2013_842)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> wrote in <521670FF.6080407@delphij.net>: de> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- de> Hash: SHA512 de> de> Hi, de> de> I've noticed that we do not install default route last (after other de> static routes). I think we should probably install it last, since the de> administrator may legitimately configure a static route (e.g. this de> IPv6 address goes to this interface) that is required by the default de> route. Do you have an example? I could imagine some theoretically but personally think that the default route which depends on a static route is one which should be avoided. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Aug_26_20_37_44_2013_842)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlIbPggACgkQTyzT2CeTzy3s+QCdF+QZ29eOQQI7iuBQpBdUsxjt 67QAoN7iRbfoSo7qEzA2w2yolz7XRqp8 =SN+U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Aug_26_20_37_44_2013_842)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130826.203744.2304902117196747104.hrs>