Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:19:41 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Installer vs RedHat Linux Fedora Core Installer? Message-ID: <459CAA8D.309@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <b35fa3120701032242q7708f3a1x9c0b5fca75488d62@mail.gmail.com> References: <ad32ec270701031142j7ed4a6dbr4690189d9f8ece3@mail.gmail.com> <20070103211426.GA60153@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <b35fa3120701032242q7708f3a1x9c0b5fca75488d62@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sunnz wrote: <snip> > On the other hand, the FBSD installer is very Microsoft-ly, the WinXP > installer doesn't have any fancy graphics at first boot, where you do > the partition/fs-format stuff - it only display a nice Microsoft Ad > thing when it starts actually installing, which I always leave it by > itself anyway. That's changing. MS is abandoning the 2000 installer and going strictly GUI, come Vista. - -Garrett -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFnKqNEnKyINQw/HARAsLPAJwOovkeM5f9V0qt0SLhEosRZwQw+QCfSvGc ++zZXqfxjr2GNmBHMxn8r0E= =fJD1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?459CAA8D.309>