Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:00:18 -0700 From: Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartmann@walstatt.org> Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r316977 - head/sys/dev/syscons Message-ID: <CAG6CVpWy5Y13oMra90nMkStt%2B8w85%2Byx7Qto3RCsg5-6gAY9tw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20170415222136.6c58a00d@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> References: <201704152003.v3FK3o3w002356@repo.freebsd.org> <20170415222136.6c58a00d@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 1:21 PM, O. Hartmann <ohartmann@walstatt.org> wrote: > Am Sat, 15 Apr 2017 20:03:50 +0000 (UTC) > Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org> schrieb: > >> Author: bde >> Date: Sat Apr 15 20:03:50 2017 >> New Revision: 316977 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/316977 > > There is a lot of development going on theses days for syscons. What's about vt()? vt() is > considered broken for x11/nvidia-driver and vt() is considered a requirement when UEFI is > boot scheme, isn't it? > > I'm just curious. Hi O., Bruce uses syscons and cares enough to improve it. He likely does not care about UEFI and definitely does not care about vt. I don't think there's anything wrong with that. We can't force volunteers to work on things they are not interested in. Best, Conrad
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG6CVpWy5Y13oMra90nMkStt%2B8w85%2Byx7Qto3RCsg5-6gAY9tw>