From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 24 08:20:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A34A5106564A for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927628FC27 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7O8K4ZP075704 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:20:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7O8K4uQ075697; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:20:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:20:04 GMT Message-Id: <200908240820.n7O8K4uQ075697@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Mikolaj Golub Cc: Subject: Re: misc/138017: pkg_delete starts segfaulting during upgrading of ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mikolaj Golub List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:20:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/138017; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mikolaj Golub To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: misc/138017: pkg_delete starts segfaulting during upgrading of ports Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:12:39 +0300 -------------------- Start of forwarded message -------------------- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:10:42 +0200 From: Mats Andreassen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090820) To: Mikolaj Golub Subject: Re: misc/138017: pkg_delete starts segfaulting during upgrading of ports Mikolaj Golub wrote: > It looks like the same problem that was reported in bin/135159. > > I suppose you have @pkgdep command in /var/db/pkg/kdelibs/+CONTENTS file > without argument. Removing this line could be workaround. > Hi! Thank you very much for the workaround. I can now confirm that my problem is a duplicate of said PR. -- regards Mats Andreassen -------------------- End of forwarded message -------------------- -- Mikolaj Golub