From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:34:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6B516A4CE; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao08.cox.net (lakemtao08.cox.net [68.1.17.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF6643D31; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:34:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kitsune@gmx.co.uk) Received: from vixen42 ([68.109.49.234]) by lakemtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040113203450.MGBM2412.lakemtao08.cox.net@vixen42>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:34:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:33:28 -0600 From: kitsune To: Stefan Walter Message-Id: <20040113143328.546d6f3c@vixen42.> In-Reply-To: <20040113195344.GA1999@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> References: <20040113152037.GA850@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> <20040113112054.0bc3aee4@vixen42.> <20040113195344.GA1999@kyuzo.dunkelkammer.void> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:14:41 -0800 cc: current@freebsd.org cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VIA KT400A and AGP/DRI? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:34:54 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:53:44 +0100 Stefan Walter wrote: > kitsune, 13.01.04, 18:20h CET: > > > Well after looking at it, I really can't thing of any reason DRI would not > > work based on dmesg... it finds the agp and the drm, so as long as X is > > setup right, it should work. What I would be suspect of is X config. Not > > sure why, but if I set the agp speed higher than 2x, it would freeze, after > > I used opengl for a bit. I would try messing with the options for that card > > in the X config and see if any of those are suspect. > > I doubt it's the X configuration; see [1] - I don't see anything special > in it, and the BIOS settings aren't aggressive at all, either. > > Pav Lucistnik said in another mail that he's having the same problem, > and that it used to work somewhere before 5.1-CURRENT. I can't comment > on the latter, of course, as I got this board yesterday only. > > Stefan > > [1]: http://www.gegenunendlich.de/stuff/kyuzo/XF86Config_kyuzo Hmm, after looking at the X config... yeah that def looks like it could def be probs with the agp device...