From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 28 20:55:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABBF16A402 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asstec@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AA143D48 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:55:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asstec@matik.com.br) Received: from [10.0.0.17] (200-171-26-52.dsl.telesp.net.br [200.171.26.52]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k3SKtKBw087426 for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:55:20 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from asstec@matik.com.br) From: AT Matik Organization: Infomatik To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 17:55:12 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <7.0.1.0.1.20060428134316.01e05648@live555.com> In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.1.20060428134316.01e05648@live555.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604281755.12871.asstec@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=BR_RECEIVED_SPAMMER,MY_DSL autolearn=no version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: Antispam Datacenter Matik msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: kernel: ath0: device timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:55:27 -0000 On Friday 28 April 2006 17:48, Ross Finlayson wrote: > I've been seeing quite a few of these (on FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE, as of a > couple of weeks ago). This is with a Compex WLM54AG miniPCI card. > > Is this a known issue, and is a fix in the works? > in my case it stopped when I compiled ath_rate_onoe instead of rate_sample = as=20 well as I got much higher throughput and response times Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br