From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 23 01:46:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A584E10 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 01:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141FD19E2 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 01:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC6420C8C for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 20:46:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 22 Dec 2013 20:46:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=smtpout; bh=cTM j3nY9UtTmbA3GOwy6QYstHkk=; b=OxmcAQoWHGoCRWEry2l7pzJJ9tfrdL6jjVZ GqobxOWsjjCd2Grhsri7mbYks5pMm/kHZ9dK+mafWniTyiXZ91oCeKYC+6DrGqYY bxIQV/Lrmgmv6QFPYVgzrjD4Jp4w0HKzktKs+r1sPAHq1HOMA+TmgOJpT+OwwJVc 9g3CU0xg= X-Sasl-enc: CO1VJyEWwZvgyBX1vmw7kFCp0+faOZSNBd1PWKP3YEK4 1387763203 Received: from [172.16.1.145] (unknown [68.117.126.78]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CF80AC00E80; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 20:46:42 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5BE3EF23-E872-47A9-83D3-41B4A886AD31"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: 10.0-RC1: bad mbuf leak? From: Mark Felder In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 19:46:41 -0600 Message-Id: References: <1387204500.12061.60192349.19EAE1B4@webmail.messagingengine.com> To: Adrian Chadd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: FreeBSD Net , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 01:46:50 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_5BE3EF23-E872-47A9-83D3-41B4A886AD31 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 On Dec 19, 2013, at 2:41, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hm, try reverting just the em code to that from a 10.0-BETA? Just in > case something changed there? >=20 finally found some free time today to try to look into this. I was = digging into the SVN changelogs of sys/dev/e1000 and couldn't see any = obvious changes that I should revert. Instead I went a different route = and jumped to HEAD/CURRENT. I'm not seeing the mbufs leaking yet. I'll = need another 24 hours to confirm. Hopefully this is a worthwhile clue. = I'm a bit surprised nobody else has reported this type of behavior... = maybe 10 isn't getting the amount of testing we expect? ...or maybe it's = just my lonely, haunted hardware :( --Apple-Mail=_5BE3EF23-E872-47A9-83D3-41B4A886AD31 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSt5YBAAoJEJg7ZFAfE+JS4QgIAImK4EQCiDMgvQohGwzqXnEK f6wVu6X3gbS3+FPxMI4btW3GpWLholsRvLhQhbXNXKRU/60UE1P6A5jh3ONTaq24 unt6yJ0GhgjC/aUp+wsJaXIvISPUSUKkBC4tUNXcx1c9Ltwyui8CW6avFIRA6rdk xkCuNczaV2BSp9fmyDpb5FBLvifbbMvvp+CAqZf4QZH1glqjfTOMdYx9IYtRMxiZ 6elxIYGRwz8iHRx/sShqoJCZTWK21fJ5fEjzhPicNKQghfpGHAENFT6GpX/3cVG+ cCLiiDdIAQeuT+jKCS7vXXDSIYfBej6FxBpaa+XF6NpjJoe4iVBqAtUAgHqvUUk= =735b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_5BE3EF23-E872-47A9-83D3-41B4A886AD31--