From owner-freebsd-current Sun Oct 8 22:36:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dfw-smtpout4.email.verio.net (dfw-smtpout4.email.verio.net [129.250.36.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F7237B66C; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 22:36:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.250.38.63] (helo=dfw-mmp3.email.verio.net) by dfw-smtpout4.email.verio.net with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #7) id 13iVbT-0006Wx-00; Mon, 09 Oct 2000 05:35:59 +0000 Received: from [204.1.90.43] (helo=power) by dfw-mmp3.email.verio.net with smtp (Exim 3.161 #1) id 13iVbT-0005yF-00; Mon, 09 Oct 2000 05:35:59 +0000 From: "Tony Johnson" To: "Alfred Perlstein" Cc: "Mike Smith" , "Bill Woods mail" , "Thomas T. Veldhouse" , " FreeBSD-Current, " Subject: RE: current.freebsd.org Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 00:35:58 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20001008222000.K272@fw.wintelcom.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Wow. Is it just me or does FreeBSD like to point fingers at everything that is not the issue. I do not believe that my mailer has anything to do with this. If you cannot roll with the punches, then that is your problem. Well deal with it and get releng4 back up. if "piss off" is an exceptable answer here, then I'd like for u to say so. Obviously "You do not get it" -----Original Message----- From: Alfred Perlstein [mailto:bright@wintelcom.net] Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 12:20 AM To: Tony Johnson Cc: Mike Smith; Bill Woods mail; Thomas T. Veldhouse; FreeBSD-Current, Subject: Re: current.freebsd.org Please get mailer that doesn't quote the messages you're replying to in such a brain dead manner. * Mike Smith wrote: > > Uh, folks, releng4 is hosted at (and donated by) Yahoo, and BSDi have > exactly *nothing* to do with its availability or otherwise. > > Before making absurd allegations like this, please apply a few neurons to > the task. Note also that you're insulting those of us that choose to > work for BSDi in the name of FreeBSD; not really the brighest of things > to do. * Tony Johnson [001008 21:38] wrote: > I was downloading 1007 this weekend and getting 7-8k a second from > current.freebsd.org. What they are saying is not totally inaccurate. > > Please stop dis-respecting other peoples comments just because you do not > agree with them! What is your comment to this... [snip] My comment would be: "you just don't get it" People are not disputing that services may have been down. People _are_ disputing that these services being down has any political agenda regarding various partnerships that the FreeBSD project has made, collabiration with BSDi, Yahoo or martians from area 51. They're requesting that people stop blowing smoke and spreading rumor, innuendo and FUD. Machines go down, networks go down, deal with it! thanks, -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message