From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Aug 31 13:24:44 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id NAA20657 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 13:24:44 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA20650 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 13:24:41 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA11783; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 13:10:45 -0700 To: "Rodney W. Grimes" cc: nate@rocky.sri.MT.net, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/disktab and stuff In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 31 Aug 1995 12:58:08 PDT." <199508311958.MAA12264@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 13:10:44 -0700 Message-ID: <11781.809899844@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Your right, thats why I tried to get the ground rules layed 2 months > ago, and I thought they had been pretty clearly layed. NO NEW CODE IN > THE 2.1 BRANCH. Yes yes. But that's not the point. What we needed were not "rules" so much as the kind of "corporate culture" necessary to follow them. It's all well and good to say things like "NO NEW CODE ..." but it still doesn't mean that everyone's lined up behind the whole concept of WHY the release is happening, when it needs to happen and HOW > > No matter, this all about to become a moot point. See my next email > to the core team. > > > -- > Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com > Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD