From owner-freebsd-git@freebsd.org Wed Jun 10 14:28:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-git@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3D1335687 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:28:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f42.google.com (mail-io1-f42.google.com [209.85.166.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49hq935gG9z447y; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f42.google.com with SMTP id r2so2412745ioo.4; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:28:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EHfiVdYajX26rItiYYqjQKpId1d4yuVf4FImjyv5s0w=; b=pX6NhG4plDGwJkN9nEuJbtpQG0ippXG0uBDLNVNeM2zgYbsWfU7bPuzs1GV7h6/JkC GWHEcge6joAeL9UxOGZazobWAG7L05w1KlZLZ9bJx5ZOsVZlUd25a6lSAJ6iYqRBRiEi qBaBBQBdSL9kQaeYl6cZ4sg6YxFSS+OmDG401c6ZKEruxEleZ+8ezmVFshFbU4/yL7Kd qACmVwYSt3NSL4KcGZP3W0anYjFQdmGTDOJfve//WCIr4APudp4/tWIj6lXFbGCV/CNX QljCJuAjS1DKAY8rTT3Itv5DLezi4owKRBcRPzjwfvwtDGtDaoL0iwmn5zrsHySKRV7p YWCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531UdeHxbP7O1E5PgbPWfVfPcgHH6FCFCL2B/+vX+VLdYqSIWluF uRgNeNl21ITV8U3PGsEd0GGBfAlOmi8b0nsvw4wxhw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwqXTvGjTIYQdHkmT7VAxxAEIIkjS0tZVxtIBuhY0i8OX9PNfmgim7fCMKfZl4kEn+8Bn52sShkA4DUfAEsoOI= X-Received: by 2002:a02:952f:: with SMTP id y44mr3415379jah.128.1591799302282; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 07:28:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ed Maste Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:28:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: When were the stable and release branches actually created? To: Warner Losh Cc: Scott Long , Peter Wemm , Scott Long , freebsd-git@freebsd.org, kensmith@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49hq935gG9z447y X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.62)[-0.617]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.74)[-0.741]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.15)[-0.147]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.166.42:from]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.166.42:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-git@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of git use in the FreeBSD project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:28:24 -0000 On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 22:41, Warner Losh wrote: > > We're on the same page here. We've grabbed the relatively easy 95%. If it's > easy to include, we're doing it. If it requires heroics, we're leaving it > aside. The mainline conversion is done, and Ulrich is just making sure... The effort we're spending now (iterating on the svn-git conversion) is to make sure the conversion will support / simplify future contrib/ software updates, and I believe that attempting to truncate the repo will in fact make that process harder. We're very much not aiming for perfection, and have already determined how additional history can be grafted in later and on a per-clone basis, should someone want "git blame" to show CSRG-era commits, for example. We could perhaps skip converting branches before stable/10, although it doesn't buy us too much - uqs@ is not spending much time.