Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 18:48:15 +0300 From: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r361679 - in head/mail/postfixadmin: . files Message-ID: <861ttpw98g.fsf@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <53C29C17.3030506@FreeBSD.org> (Matthew Seaman's message of "Sun, 13 Jul 2014 15:47:51 %2B0100") References: <201407131331.s6DDV1L7076195@svn.freebsd.org> <53C29C17.3030506@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On 13/07/2014 14:31, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: >> Log: >> - Update to 2.3.7, which contains a security fix. >> - Support staging. > > If there's a security update for which a CVE number is issued, then the > port needs to have > > [...] Given the lack of responsiveness of the maintainer in the PR I mentioned, I guess you can go ahead and do that. Taking one step back, I would love to have this CPE thing broadly announced by portmgr -- I see some commits related to this but have no idea what I am supposed to do (I learned of the wiki page a few hours ago, but that still doesn't say when and why this became a requirement).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?861ttpw98g.fsf>