From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 18 17:59:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A88D15066 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 17:59:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cmascott@world.std.com) Received: from world.std.com (root@world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by europe.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA05159 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 20:59:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from europa.local (root@world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5]) by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA06584 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 20:57:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from cmascott@localhost) by europa.local (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA00386 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 20:57:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from cmascott) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 20:57:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Carl Mascott Message-Id: <199908190057.UAA00386@europa.local> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Is 3.2-R soft updates still considered alpha? Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is soft updates in FreeBSD 3.2-R still considered alpha? (That's what the README says, but the README is quite old.) Is it not yet recommended for general use? Thanks! P.S. Please e-mail me directly. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message