From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 6 02:08:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B42316AD57; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 01:34:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from www.cryptography.com (li-22.members.linode.com [64.5.53.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE2543D45; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 01:34:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (n219077215102.netvigator.com [219.77.215.102]) by www.cryptography.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k561YRqL020834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:34:29 -0700 Message-ID: <4484DB40.1010907@root.org> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:32:48 -0700 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek References: <20060605223446.AD29316DBF5@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060605223446.AD29316DBF5@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/geom/class/eli geom_eli.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 02:08:47 -0000 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > pjd 2006-06-05 21:40:54 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sbin/geom/class/eli geom_eli.c > Log: > Userland bits of geli(8) data authentication. > Now, encryption algorithm is given using '-e' option, not '-a'. > The '-a' option is now used to specify authentication algorithm. > > Supported by: Wheel Sp. z o.o. (http://www.wheel.pl) > > Revision Changes Path > 1.11 +29 -15 src/sbin/geom/class/eli/geom_eli.c Excellent! One of my longstanding complaints has been that no block encryption software supported integrity, only privacy. http://www.root.org/talks/Usenix_20040629.pdf As far as the flag change goes, won't this make it difficult to MFC this new feature later? -- Nate