From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 25 14:25:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from penelope.skunk.org (penelope.skunk.org [208.133.204.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA06814A2D for ; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 14:24:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@penelope.skunk.org) Received: from localhost (ben@localhost) by penelope.skunk.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA80370; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 17:30:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 17:30:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Ben Rosengart To: jbryant@tfs.net Cc: David Schwartz , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: trek73 In-Reply-To: <199910252114.QAA59132@argus.tfs.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You're talking as if litigious corporations follow logic and common sense. This is more the exception than the rule IMO. Don't construe this as arguing against the inclusion of trek73 ... I think you're probably right that the risk is minimal, but for different reasons. -- Ben Rosengart UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group StarMedia Network, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message